When do you get to that point when “enough is enough”?
Relationships are hard. This seems to be a fact, for me at least. I realize there are a lot of people making this whole thing look easy, not to mention all the ridiculous cultural assumptions and images that are out there, but for me, this shit is hard. R and I talk about this a lot, and we always talk about how people have had such a notoriously difficult time with our singleness. Initially, it was flattering, but soon, the inquiries were just tedious. Being single is not really all that bad folks, trust us. In fact, R talks often about how really, at this point, if someone is not enhancing his experience and forcing him to compromise in ways he does not want to, why should he bother? I see both the validity and the shortcomings in that sentiment for sure, but it sure does give you pause when the work you are doing for a relationship seems to be dictating all the elements of your life.
I am not single anymore – or right now, or however one is supposed to say that. And I have found myself making compromises that at first seemed like small, innocuous little things that could easily be managed to promote the greater good – the General Welfare, as it were. But I am not a Founding Father, and my relationship is not based upon a Constitution. So here I was. Super.Fucking.Irritated.
The thing about it is though, it was my choice to make those compromises, I was not asked. And I bet if I took a different tack, I would get the same response I am getting for making the compromise in the first place, so maybe I should take a look at my own thinking.
In a relationship it seems like there are a few things that need to exist for it to have any chance for survival.
- The two people need to care about each other. A lot. This does not have to be demonstrated every second of every minute of every day, but there needs to be an underlying foundation of this caring for anything else to work.
- The two people need to have similar goals/ideals for the relationship. In terms of big things (kids) and not as big things (money, family time.) Or maybe those are all big things, I am not sure. Either way they seem important.
- The two people don’t necessarily need to have matching political or religious ideologies, I know this from real life examples, though, if they differ, the people better be pretty decent abstract thinkers. Concrete sinks.
- The two people should be nice to each other. The old adage is that mean people suck, and boy is that shit true. I don’t mean like you have a fight and act mean because you are pissed, I mean being mean as a way of dealing with life. It is really unpleasant. In fact, I think that being a nice person can really compensate for a lot of other shortcomings (case in point: Jerry in The Mexican). But if a person is mean to their partner, it negates all of the other good qualities in them. All.Of.Them. As a side note, it also makes the other person feel like they are on the crazy train because the only way out of being mean for a meanie is to just shift gears, there is no metacognitive analysis because that would force them to look at being mean.
- The two people need to not be afraid. This means not being afraid to be honest. It also means not being afraid to be without the other. I know this from personal experience. And as I mentioned, not great experience, but real. Staying with someone because you are afraid of what life will be without them does not mean you are in love with them or meant to be with them, it means that you are taking a ton of their shit – out of fear. The “Devil-you-know” theory is a crock of shit. Unless you want to be with the Devil.
How to know the difference?
May 27, 2012 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Life, Perception, Relationships, true stories | Tags: fear, love, Regina Spektor, Relationships, sanity, The Mexican, tolerance, true love | Leave A Comment »
The Illusion of Perfection, part 1
I knew a couple once, in what was like another lifetime, that seemed like this absolutely RomCom reality. They were like perpetual honeymooners. It wasn’t just that they never fought, it was that they clearly, outwardly (and in every way) adored each other all the time. All.The.Time. It was as if they had somehow managed to capture that first week/month/(or so) thrill of infatuation and live within it.
It reminded me of a Disney movie.
Umm. She was asleep. Yeah, I know…
I spent quite a bit of time with this couple, and I will not say when or in what capacity because in this case confidentiality is really important, but the more important thing is to know how much I idealized these two. He was older and she was his second (younger) wife. And they fawned over each other, and they were ever considerate, he in the way the foppish guy in the RomCom always is, eliciting groans from the male audience, and ‘awwwww,’ from the girls. Even tough girls do it so don’t front. She was sometimes silly in that reborn nerd girl kind of way, and he always played the straight man, ever patient, never getting ruffled. They seemed to be a Perfect Couple.
The person I was with when I first met them had no time for them. He was not impressed at all. My next partner during this time – not always the sharpest tool in the shed – always said he thought something was off. [Sometimes those well-used tools shine bright.] My mom said the same thing of them, not that it was an act exactly , but that it certainly seemed to exact effort. Eventually, I knew their secrets. All of them. Well, all of hers, and the ones he had shared with her. I imagine with the number of secrets she had that he would never know, he must have had some doozies that she did not know. They were the kind of secrets that, even in a soap opera, would elicit incredulity. It was clichéd dirty laundry of the worst sort. And even when she told all my secrets, I never told hers because I knew that he would leave her if he found them out. Absolutely. As far as I know they are still together, but she must go to bed every night knowing the secrets she cannot tell. I think now that this is what contributes to her manic adoration. But I don’t really know. Anyhow, that was the Perfect Couple I knew.
I found myself thinking of this perfect couple not too long ago. The Neo-Honeymooners. I was living in that heady, intense, early onset adoration that develops – if you are lucky – in the initial stages of a relationship. While I was giddily (is that a word?) soaking it all up, I was amazed that it appeared I had stumbled upon that magic elixir of perpetual infatuation. This would never end! Huzzah! I win!
I forgot for a minute that every magic elixir I know of knocks you out and leaves you with a whopping hangover at best, or maybe just puts you into some comatose state of delusion [see exhibit Sleeping Beauty, above.]
And so when the moment came when I had to see this person as a real human and not some Disney character, I had to pause. Had I failed? Was I doomed to a perpetual cycle of up and down romance always culminating in some sort of dramatic downward spiral? Those were my first thoughts. Definitely. But then, I sat with myself and looked at those ideas more closely. It dawned on me that as reality emerged through the foggy illusion of [let's face it, one-dimensional] perfection, it was probably happening for him too in regard to me. And he did not seem all that troubled by it. When I fretted about my own reality poking through the rainbow haze, he didn’t do anything, he just stayed right there.
And that is something.
This whole living in reality thing seems very adult. And there are parts of it that also seem really uninspired. But, I do not go to bed harboring secrets. And I know that he is not bothered by the fact that I did not put away the clean laundry, or that everyday is not like a RomCom holiday. We are humans and [mostly] doing the best we can for each other all the time. I guess that means we really like each other. A lot.
Then I though about another “Perfect Couple” I know. And another. And another. What has made them all perfect is how they embrace the imperfections. [Or, at least manage them and deal with them...] I know this is not always easy. Or fun. But that is the magic of the real Honeymooners: One of these days, POW! Right in the kisser…!
The Kramden’s knew what a real honeymoon was.
I have – I’ve got an explanation. A perfect one. I’m a dope. Not a run-of-the-mill dope, the world’s champ. For years I’ve been taking for granted the most wonderful thing that’s ever happened to me – you. I’ve never shown you the appreciation you deserve, Alice. You could walk outta that door right now and I wouldn’t blame you. You deserve something better than me. There are a million guys who’d give you anything if they could have a girl like you.
Ralph, I don’t want a million. There’s just one guy I want: you.
Baby, you’re the greatest.
April 29, 2012 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Family, Friends, Life, Perception, Relationships, true stories | Tags: being a grown up, Friends, Perfection, Perfectionism, real life, reality, Relationships, Sleeping beauty, The Honeymooners, true stories | Leave A Comment »
A Letter, #7
Dr. Man…
I was telling someone about Oscar Wao the other day and so of course you came to mind – how would I have ever had the chance to spend an evening in the company of one of my all time favorite authors ever, if not for you. Then I got to thinking about the evenings we had spent together. When I say it like that, it sounds much more salacious, no? Ironical in that we never were. Mostly, I was thinking about how grateful I am to have had you to be a total intellectual and literary snob with for all my years in the 852. Though I had a few others with whom I could do this there was something special about you. Maybe it was your ability to be upside down – you know I do always advocate for inversion.
I started writing this letter the day after Christmas. I was in San Diego for a friend’s birthday – the same friend for whose birthday I had flown to San Diego on December 26 2004 when the tsunami hit Thailand. When that happened I had no concept of South East Asia at all, now eight years later, in many ways Thailand feels like my backyard neighbor. Anyhow, my point was that I started writing this on the 26th of December, and it is now the 6th of April. Weird how time gets away – and how it changes how I see things, whether Thailand or you or everything around me.
You know, you sort of epitomized the kind of guy I imagined (hoped) I would meet when I went over seas. Wicked smart, adventurous, experienced in many things, open-minded, rather a Renaissance man if I do say (even if you are Canadian… And I did always crack up to hear you call yourself an Americanist, though I know it is totally accurate in professional terms, it still makes me giggle.) But lately I have been facing the reality that what we see is not necessarily not what we get, it just clouds over a lot of other things that we are also getting. Or not. Which brought me back to you and how I saw you as this rather idealized creature, unfair to you more than I me I suppose, and so as I got to know you, foibles and all, they were somehow more disappointing initially. But then, they became important humanizing features. Like a good scar. All this and you and I were really just the definitive platonic friends. Imagine the complexities involved when these realities hit home with those we are intimate with.
And they have for me, as I know they often did for you. One of the great similarities you and I have always had is the incompatibility between the people we like and the people we are attracted to. We are not alone, you know, I know a great many people who suffer this exact same disconnect. It is odd that we can see so clearly in others the disastrous choices that we are blind to ourselves. I would laugh when you would tell me about your romantic woes – in a friendly way of course – but I am not laughing now, you can be sure.
This brings me back to the delay in finishing your letter. Swept away I have been, as you (or Yoda) might say. Overwhelmed with work, and caught up in the hopeful fantasy of what romance has to offer. The burden we place on romance, eh? Another one of the great mysteries of a rational mind. As if an emotion with all the same indicators of intoxication could really be the thing that makes all the difference. What initially hides all of the imperfections of humanity at once exposes them as extremes. Of course I remember one of my yoga masters, I think you knew Samrat, who said to beware feelings that were so high so fast, for the world seeks balance and one such extreme will be met with another. And of course, the gurujis always seem to know.
I wonder if you too have been swept away in some metaphorical way. I miss you and your strange and silly wit, and your semantic aberrations. I miss the simplicity of Hong Kong that in many ways I never did appreciate while I was there. I miss having an accurate reflection of myself in a friend like you, someone I really trusted, quickly and deeply, and it seems rightly so.
I still often go back to the text you sent after we saw each other last:
Damn. You reminded me so much of why I miss(ed) you, and Grad School, ie Western literacy/cosmopolitanism. _My Dinner with Andre_: actually actual, not actually impossible. You remind me why I love books and bookishness above fucking all. Gracias, doctora, muchisima. O to the X.
In so many ways that brief missive sustains me, (especially as I know you and I both continue to seek the actually impossible rather than accept the actually actual we have right before us) and I love how you see me even when you don’t.
O to the X.
a
April 6, 2012 | Categories: Friends, Letters to Friends, Life, Philosophical Underpinnings, Relationships, true stories | Tags: friendship, Hong Kong, Little Dragon, Relationships, Ritual Union, The Brief and Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao | Leave A Comment »
An Urban Cowboy: You blend.
For the last month, I (inadvertently) conducted a social experiment. It was inadvertent insofar as I never really planned to be hosting a Cowboy in the City, but then, as we all know… the best laid plans… Anyhow, the experiment went something like this:
In the heart of San Francisco, and really all around the greater Bay Area, I strolled around with a 6’3″ guy wearing a bright and shiny [Stetson] Resistol hat. When he first arrived (wearing the hat) and picked me up at work, I kept stealing sideways glances. I mean, to be fair, the only reason I met him in the first place** was because of this same hat, but… here? In Berkeley? San Francisco? The Hat? Hmmmm. He wears it well, but I have to say I was very aware of the hat initially.
“He is wearing the hat in the City?” A. asks for confirmation after I tell her this.
“Yeah.”
“Really?”
“Yeah.”
“That is so funny. But in a way, it is like the ultimate hipster statement, you know.”
“Thanks.”
I arrange for the Cowboy to go surfing with a coworker.
“You weren’t kidding when you said he was a cowboy…
He showed up at 7 in the morning with a ten gallon hat and a dip.”
No, not kidding.
I meet him at a favorite local pub in the East Bay. The entire bar has already befriended him. They love him. They want to know if he rides. Rides what, he wants them to clarify (boys will be boys, even in a Resistol, it seems.) “This guy is amazing,” gushes a besotted 20-something guy.
We walk down Mission Street. “Hey Cowboy! Nice hat, amigo!”
We walk down Valencia Street and see a guy rolling a joint on the ledge of the Social Security building. The Cowboy does a double-take, which could in some circumstances be a bit dicey. In this case, we get a smile, “You must be from L.A., eh?” the dextrous smoker suggests. “No, San Diego,” the Cowboy answers back with ease, “Just not used to seeing such an open attitude, you know?” “Welcome to San Fran,” the smoker replies.
We walk down Octavia Street. “Hey Cowboy! Where did you get such a pretty lady? Got anymore like that?” “Nah… not like this,” he says.
We walk down Market Street. “I love your hat,” a woman says at the red light. She is clearly a little down on her luck, but the hat makes her smile and she recalls a hat she used to wear, just like this one, while we wait for the light to change. Amidst a sea of suits destined for hopeful happy hours and orthopedic surgeons in town for a conference unaware that one should ditch the name tag outside the conference hall, the hat stands out even more. As she tells her story the lady looks at him with a sort of earnestness I don’t see often. The light changes.
Further down Market, a tall guy in black steam punk stylings with a wizard hat stares. Really, dude? You’re staring?
We go to a store (that shall remain unnamed to protect my ego) to exchange a dress. I cannot find the dress I am looking for and I cannot get anyone to help me. The Cowboy has the undivided attention of one of the salesgirls in no time. “Where are you from?” She wants to know. “And can I help you?” She works with us for over thirty minutes to track down this dress. I am quite sure it had little to do with me.
Later, in another store in the south side of the City, the sales girl, wanting to be done with her shift, which will end in minutes says, “Don’t you look like a fine Southern couple!” I laugh. Maybe. “Where are you from?” “Here,” I answer. Her disappointment fades as she looks at the Cowboy.
We are on an escalator in a major shopping center. “Hey buddy, is that a Stetson?” “Nope, Resistol, but it is an offshoot of Stetson.” “Nice!”
We wait for Bart at Balboa Park. A black lady with glitter and inked lines on her face, which complement her blue dreadlocks, set off nicely by a “Brad Pitt helmet” comes up to us. She speaks almost directly to the hat. “Are you coming from the Cow Palace? Is the rodeo in town? Have you been to the Grand National Rodeo? I love the rodeo. I was married to a cowboy. That was before I married the German, the Russian and the Finn. I should have stayed in Finland. But seriously, I am not crazy, I know people think I am crazy but I am not. I just know the best people in the world, you know who they are? They are Cowboys. People around here, they don’t understand that. I do, though. I know. I am going to school now. Two more semesters. Then I might go back to Finland. The people here, they just don’t know good people. I make hats, you know? I sell them down in the financial district where people pay $15 for a beer. But they don’t like to spend money on hats. You are not from here are you? You two probably live, where? Let’s see, not in the most racist place on earth, that would be Berkeley, no, not there. But I know the police in Berkeley. They are good people. Police and Cowboys. Livermore? Do you live in Livermore? Fremont maybe? All I know, you know, you are gorgeous, do you know that? She is gorgeous, you know that right? Well, I just wanted to tell you that I could tell you were good folks. I know these kinds of things. Though, if you ask the German or the Russian they will tell you something different, but that doesn’t matter. I should have stayed in Finland. That’s where I will go back when I finish school, two more semesters. There or Texas, I love Texas.” Then the train comes. We all get on together, but not. I waved good-bye when we got off in the Mission and I wondered if she noticed where we were. She waved goodbye to the hat.
With a sweetness that makes me smile, the Cowboy comments on how everyone looks at me when we walk around the city. I look at him and laugh, gently. “Um. No. I am fairly certain they are looking at you…” He kindly (though incorrectly) disagrees. We are having lunch with my yoga instructor and I am telling him about this disagreement and highlighting my point with a story of a walk through the Castro. My yoga teacher laughs and looks at the Cowboy. “Um, honey, the boys in the Castro are most certainly looking at you. A tall stranger in a cowboy hat? Yeah, they are checking you out for sure.” I laugh now too, validated, because we know I like to be right, but also laughing in concert with the whole table. “Okay, maybe in the Castro,” the Cowboy concedes with a grin.
Walking into a bar for the second time in a month, the Cowboy gets a familiar nod from the bartender who served him two weeks ago. He knows the hat, and he would appreciate such stylings, as his perfectly waxed Mission mustache clearly indicates. Days later he and the Cowboy randomly meet in the street and greet each other like old friends. Maybe he does blend.
I guess it is true what they say about good clothes opening doors. I just never figured on good clothes being a bright white Resistol in the urban confines of my City by the Bay.
** December 30, 2011, Dr. I’s Big Birthday
As the evening progresses at the house party of the season in a very trendy North County beach community all is going as one might expect: good music, fabulous people, amazing food, a busy bartender, standard urban-chic-beach-stylings, and… a Cowboy? Are you kidding me? “Only Dr. I would have a Cowboy at his house party…” I say to a passerby acknowledging the Resistol, which stood no chance of blending. With raised eyebrow Dr. I says, “That Cowboy is a total bad ass.” Now it is my turn to raise an eyebrow. A half an hour later A. comes up to me, pen and paper in hand, we record all the best lines, overheard or otherwise shared at all our events. “Oh my god, you won’t believe what Pam just overheard!” she exclaims. “Someone just said, ‘Only Dr. I would have a Cowboy at his party!’ How hilarious is that?” ”Not quite as hilarious as the fact that you are quoting me to me,” I tell her. I look over at the Cowboy again. Interesting. He stays until the end of the party. The very, very, very end.
February 24, 2012 | Categories: California, Life, Perception, San Francisco, Silliness, true stories | Tags: Boyfriends, boys, Cowboy Diaries, Friends, My Cousin Vinny, perspective, Relationships, Resistol hats, Stetson hats | Leave A Comment »
Rule #1: Be sure you are not placed on the end of any group photo.
My parents recently moved back to the area. Apparently the true 1%ers they have spent a lifetime trying not to be, they are now going to be snowbirds, (of a sort, still choosing rather atypical resting points.) As this move was getting closer everyone was asking me about it: Was I excited? Did I want to be closer to them? Was it going to be ‘too close’? I never really thought much about my answers. Of course I was glad, I have not lived within a reasonable driving distance of my parents since 1988 – at which point we were still living together. And after more than five years of a minimum of 18 hours of travel time to see them, I have been looking forward to easier parental access. Haven’t I?
Plus, if you know my parents, they are kind of The Shit.
Anyhow, along come the holidays… always an ass-kicking time at work and the days don’t just seem shorter because of the dark, I am convinced they really are shorter. Add to that, the family equation and life just gets busy. But it’s cool you know.
It makes for good material.
Unfortunately mom has taken to proclaiming that I am not allowed to write about certain things. Like my family. I can’t always tell which family things will get the kibosh and which will be okay, it seems kind of random. Okay, that is not entirely true, but I have to say I was getting seriously censored for a while. But, the way I am looking at it, their locality puts them back on the front page. I was willing to let slide many an opportune tale while they were up North, but now their mountain hiatus has come to an end.
So.
I will make little mention of the navigational skill of the Ways-ie App, or my step-dad’s triple-protected new-new iPhone. I’m going to jump right into my Bridget Jones montage. [The Back to Future remake will be for a later installment.]
That pretty much sums it up. For the second time in two weeks, I was completely mal-attired and borrowing clothes in order to not be simply ridiculous – though as my aunt says, at least I did not show up in a bunny costume.
But barely. Visualize, if you will, my arrival: Jeans (7 for All Mankind, but still: JEANS) and motorcycle boots. And a cute black t-shirt. And I walk in and see my grandma all dressed up. For high tea in honor of her birthday with all of the ladies.
There were petit fours on the table for goodness sake.
I thought it was weird that my uncle wondered why I wasnt carrying anything with me when he picked me up at the train station. And my aunt asked me if I needed to hang anything up. I definitely did not get the memo. Suffice it to say that one more day would be spent in a state of awkward dress. [The irony that I spent years cultivating awkward style for family events is not lost on me. A particular outfit of blue and black plaid pants, blue suede boots, a fuchsia over-sized button down shirt over long-sleeved thermals and a fedora comes to mind.]
Back to now, the afternoon moved along into the evening… everyone else was dressed totally appropriately, not that I want to harp on this, or anything, but any thoughts that my Bridget moments were finished would be incorrect.
“So, do you have a love in your life?” I was asked.
“Umm, no, not at the moment.”
“Oh, the last time we saw each other I think you were with someone.”
“Yes, yes I was.” I say. [I want to say, 'Yes, #3. He was the one who went to jail and led to Rule #1. What is Rule #1? See that picture over there? You see how it looks like I have a hand growing out of my abdomen? Yes, that is the effect of Rule #1: never find yourself on the end of any group photo. Excising (or exorcising) of anyone is made far too easy if you are on the end. That is what happened to #3. And you should see us jockey for position in the group photos these days.']
I don’t say that.
“That can’t be the granddaughter?”
“Oh, no, this is A, not K…”
“Ahh, I see I knew it hadn’t been that long!”
In discussing my work with a really amazing couple they tell me they are in a Current Events Group, and that it is really fun “because everyone is a [whispers] Democrat.” I smile and explain that if it were not that way, “group” might not be the correct noun. “We probably shouldn’t talk about politics,” she whispers, shh-ing me.
Sitting down to eat, my step-dad and I get to talking. Somehow my (lack of a) love life comes up again. I am not bothered by this conversation, I know the discussion comes from a place of concern… or maybe that is the wrong word, but I am sure my parents just want for me what they’ve got. And truth be told, what they’ve got is awesome. But, still… I don’t really know why I why I don’t meet many people and etcetera and etcetera. [Not totally true: I don't meet people because I work all the time and because most people my age [who are not categorically dysfunctional or insane] are happily married to rad people, or gay.]
By the end of the evening, my clothes faux pas (and my neglect in remembering to bring my camera), my obvious singleness, and my concern over mom being angsty about all of the above had faded. Partaking in a marathon goodbye (the length of the goodbye seems directly proportional to proximity) none of it seemed to matter. I was getting a ride home from my parents and the weekend was still young. I made a call to see about going out.
Maybe some things really are meant to stay the same.
Just be sure to get to the middle when the group photos commence.
December 6, 2011 | Categories: California, Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Family, Home, Life, Silliness, true stories | Tags: birthdays, Bridget Jones, Bridget Jones' Diary, clothes, Family, love-life, Relationships, style, Trats and Vicars, true stories | Leave A Comment »
A letter, #6
I don’t really want to acknowledge you by writing to you, but I am justifying it by saying it is because I had a really lovely interaction with someone yesterday and the circumstances of the interaction were too eerily similar to the first interaction we had to ignore. Let’s just hope that a) I have learned to take these kinds of things with a substantial grain of salt, and b) that this person is not a total fucking jerk, like you.
In hindsight, you look like just as big of an asshole as you did following the initial reveal of your rectal-craneal inversion, but I can also see the benefits of our interactions now. I did learn that a repartee as dynamic and cohesive as ours was likely to be only that. Seriously, you are like the Sun Tzu of conversation. Sadly, I had hoped you would be the Lao Tzu… but no need to go into ancient Chinese philosophy to make my point.
In the midst of a busy day, I received a lovely note from a stranger – southerly located as well, I fear. Among a lot of other comments and feedback of similar nature this one stood out because it was not only on point intellectually, but because it managed to strike out the perfect chords of flattery for me – not everyone understands the sorts of compliments that might make me go weak in the knees (present knee condition aside.) But this brief missive hit them all.
It was strange how instinctively I felt compelled to reply to the comment. And as I started to I was overwhelmed with a deja-vu so powerful (even more so than spending two nights in the home of my childhood and adolescence earlier this week) that I had to pause.
What was it?
Fuck me. It was you. It all came back.
This time I laughed out loud rather than get all angsty.
You came up in another conversation not that long ago, you know? It was quite hilarious really. The thing is, a friend of mine (who I met via an internet friend, ironically – or not, I don’t know) in LA was telling me a story of an absolutely hideous date. Well, it was hideous in terms of its inability to come to fruition more than anything else (you see?) The funny thing about this is that, earlier in the week, pre-date, she had contacted me to be sure the date in question was not You.
Srsly.
Why would she do that? Well, do let me explain. In full. I feel that the story has far more gravitas that way. I began blogging (aha! How you and I met!) because of a woman, we’ll call C, while I was in Hong Kong. I am ever grateful to C for a number of things, but the public discourse impetus stands far and above many. C and I became acquainted, thusly, and actually never IRL, as they say until last spring – more than three years after the fact. Anyhow, I eventually became internet friends with a friend of C’s, who we’ll call M. C and M knew each other IRL, but had met as a result of the interwebs. And cats. But that is definitely another story. In getting to know M, who I met IRL way before I met C – quien sabe – it turns out that one of her old college friends is the woman you told me was your BFF.
Whoa!
Anyhow, it does seem to be that you and your BFF are less BF and more maybe like “f”. Regardless, the BfF in question had connected M and her “date”, at which point M wanted to be sure that the Date was not You, as M is acutely aware of the douchbaggery of your past actions. Obviously, the Date was not You, but the fact that we thought it could be was hilarious. You are a wee bit famous after all, even if it is not for patenting pre-bio-fuels. In the end, we just decided that BfF is not a girl whose male friends one should deal with if possible. Did you ever think that your BfF would enter into my circle like that? Yeah, I know you didn’t, and I cannot tell you what great pleasure I take in knowing that.
Srsly.
So, today as I reread the sentiments I so enjoyed receiving yesterday I still am happy to consider them, but I am careful to maintain context and tell myself that pleasant interactions are not necessarily indicative of anything more than that, kindred spirits or otherwise. And I suppose I have you to thank for that. I also am aware that you are still stalking this blog (more than 100 times in the last quarter? Wow.) So it is likely that you will eventually read this and maybe you to will take something new away from it. You are not a horrible person – you’re just a sad little man. Like the Wizard of Oz. Only less altruistic and with an ego that even fire and flame and the Emerald City would not satiate. (Ooh, look at that, I passively insulted you in my attempt to mitigate my earlier name-calling. Ooops.)
And that is why I sat down to write this letter to you today.
Srsly,
a x
November 27, 2011 | Categories: Absurd Shit, Friends, Letters to Friends, Relationships, true stories | Tags: blog searches, blog stats, Blogging, interconnectedness, internet, internet communication, internet stalkers, kindred spirits, Lao Tzu, Of Montreal, Relationships, Sun Tzu | Leave A Comment »
Coffee: DENIED!!
Last week I went back to my hometown for a Halloween party. I even wore a costume and everything. I don’t go up there very often, and every time that I do go… I am glad. Thought I was going to say I regret it, huh? Nope. Anyhow, R and I got to the party fashionably late and in high style. Who knew that this evening would lead to my latest WTF moment…
One of the things that I enjoy about going to the hometown is that all of the pressure of socializing with an agenda is out the window. I have long abandoned the idea that this particular little slice of heaven would bring forth a guy I would want to date… or would want to date me for that matter – let’s not forget I did more than a decade of hard time there, so I have some context for this attitude. Plus, when I am there I am generally flanked by R so I have a nice comfortable landing spot, and exit strategy. This shindig was no exception to my previously established assumptions. Therefore, you can imagine my surprise to make contact with someone (new) who seemed pretty interesting, and who has an incredible back story as well. Suffice it to say I was intrigued enough that it made the next morning’s brunch conversation agenda.
Over the course of several hours of brunch Dr. T and R and I talked about the changing social dynamic we are facing these days re: meeting people, and of course the inherent distinction between his, and ours. Facts being what they are, it is a lot easier to be a dude of our – shall we say, station – or just be honest and say age? It reminded me of this sentiment from an article about all the Single Ladies:
I realized that I too have always just assumed that the whole “love” thing would just work itself out. It turns out that is a bit naive, and by the way, don’t read that article if you are still in that frame of mind: total spoiler. So, we contemplated, what was the best course of action to take in navigating these waters, (which seem like they should get smoother with maturity – not more fucking rocky)? We could all speak to different strategies coupled with equally diverse (and though often humorous, still disappointing) outcomes.
Should one “get out there” and try to make things happen even if it’s not what you were naturally inclined to do? Should you use places in your comfort zone as a “hunting ground”? Internet dating? The fact of it is, all of it made me want to barf in my cappuccino. I have always said that if I wasn’t going to meet someone doing what I normally do, and in the course of my normal life, then I wasn’t going to meet the right person. I still believe that, but the reality of that scenario is that I work pretty much around the clock during the school year, using my free time for yoga and the gym… and then I want to travel when I am not working. This is not conducive to being a successful dater (which we have long-established I have no idea how to do anyhow.) Not to mention, I don’t even know what i am looking for. This particular line of rhetoric was precipitated by my admission that I do not go out on Friday night. “I am just too tired,” I told Dr. T. “But it seems like you are always doing stuff… totally energetic,” she replied. “You can’t trust Facebook,” I reminded her.
And here it is, Friday night and I am home. Exhausted. Not at all unhappy, but completely aware that my staying in perpetuates the reality that I will continue to reduce the odds of meeting someone new and interesting or at least the bearer of interesting potential.
So, maybe it was not too crazy to consider someone I met in my hometown. Shit, I have certainly considered far more suspect possibilities in places far afield.
Information was acquired (from both sides of the equation, I might add) and contact was made. “Let’s get together for coffee or something…” “That would be great, we should have some free time coming up with the holidays…” “By the way, I thought you were gorgeous.”
Aaawwwwww.
And then the Facebook connection was established. I looked at his profile. I saw some things that made me go “Hmmmmmm….” [You went to Pahrump? On purpose? FOR.FIREARMS TRAINING????] But, in my typical optimistic fashion (don’t laugh I am an optimist, but of course only in the most ridiculous circumstances) I overlooked these few things. After all, had I not just spent hours talking with my best friends about how (c’est la vie said the old folks, it goes to show… ) you never can tell? Plus, you can’t trust Facebook.
Plans were made. Life went on. Two days later I got this message:
Listen, why don’t we hold off getting together for that drink. After checking out your fb stuff I realized that you and I are polar opposite on our politics. Friendship sounds a hell of a lot better at this point.
Of course, being the headcase that I can sometimes be, my first reaction was to go back and look at my Facebook page. Umm… What? I couldn’t even figure out how it was “political.” Save for the poster from my union that one of my amazing coworkers made for us to carry at the General Strike standing behind Occupy Oakland… oh, hm. Perhaps that is political. But, as a historian, I would certainly NOT miss an event like that! And as a teacher (he is one too) who in the world could be anti-union? I looked further. I had a Howard Zinn quote. Okay, maybe I am a little political. I considered all of this in a new light. But cancelling a coffee date? I shook my head. Does the guy know anything about me? Well, he is related to people I have known since I was six. He knows where I grew up, not a traditionally conservative bastion – though these days, sheesh. Everything else he gleaned from… from… Facebook?
I looked at all the stuff on my Facebook. Things I have selected to share with a very wide variety of people and re-reconsidered. It may be political. It may ideological. Hell, it may be psychological. But mostly, in my opinion, it is there to be intellectual – and I don’t mean all smarty pants, but I mean to engender thought, or perspective. Yeah, even argument. Some of the people I respect most in my life are the ones who really come at me from a different angle and are not afraid. [That would be you, Mr. Fox Island.] But in the end I went back to the same old place:
“Seriously. Am I not cute enough to override the red flags??? Do you know how many guys I have gone out with in spite of the plethora of screaming scarlet banners??????”
Ooohhhh…
Wait a minute…
…perhaps Mr. Freinship-sounds-a-hell-of-a-lot-better-at-this-point is on to something here…
November 4, 2011 | Categories: California, Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Friends, Home, Life, Relationships, true stories | Tags: age, best friends, Beyonce, Chuck Berry, coffee, dating, Facebook, friendship, hometowns, Poor relationship choices, Relationships, self-image, self-realization, self-reflection, Single Ladies, singleness, singles, You Never Can Tell | 6 Comments »
A letter, #2
Whey hey! You called tonight. I thought it must be a pocket dial at first, but no, you were calling. No text this time, and to be fair it was long before midnight. But seriously, a call from a cab between bars and, and where? My house? Please. You know the thing about it is, I actually really like you. But, we all know my track record with this… and as much as I hate to admit it, I don’t think my liking you is enough anymore. That is why I respectfully declined your backwards invitation to come over. Not that you ever require an explanation, but there you go.
Sometimes when we are together I look at you and my mind goes funny places. Like when I consider the reality of “us”. You always say, “it is what it is”. That is factual data. And what it is, is totally perplexing. It is beyond bizarro that I ever find myself sitting there with you. I mean, we talk about great stuff. We have tons of things in common. You read. You call me on my shit. You know amazing people. You are pretty much a thrill ride. All good stuff.
But, you also have a ton of baggage, that you don’t seem to want to get rid of. You don’t call ahead. You admitted underestimating me. You are the King of the Compli-sult. You don’t actually like “me”. I mean, you “like” me, but you know, whatevs. And it’s cool. It is a little bit of a bummer because I did like hanging out with you, but not as much as I liked the idea of it. And that too, is factual data.
It’s all good and it most certainly is what it is. See you around the neighborhood.
a x
October 16, 2011 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Letters to Friends, Life, Relationships, San Francisco, true stories | Tags: choices, Friends, friendship limits, Relationships, TV on the Radio | Leave A Comment »
Of cows, rules and realities.
I have been so busy lately. People who know me would know this by my absence in several areas where I usually have a greater presence. I have not been writing much. Or at least I have not been finishing anything I start writing – and when this happens I tend to get really mentally muddled. All this shit bouncing around my brain, leading me to feel more overwhelmed and then more busy…
For the most part has been a good busy, like work stuff, which I like, and people stuff, which I like (more on that presently.) I have also decided that I am going to try to go to the gym every day this month – sort of like a challenge to myself, and I don’t really like or dislike this. Though I have to say I am enjoying the fact that for the first time – probably ever – I am not going to the gym because I feel physically repugnant, but because I am trying to do something to make my knee situation better. It is nice to be freed up of the more superficial elements about going to the gym. Though, truth be told, I would feel like a giant cow if I were still in Hong Kong. Fortunately – in America I feel really thin – so, there you have the benefit of perspective, I suppose.
Speaking of cows, one of the things that has been leading to my busy-ness is a significant amount of mental energy going towards an unexpected focal point. I have been spending time (in hindsight not that much time, but that it seems like a lot is interesting) with a person who I enjoy allowing to take up my time. [This person is wicked smart and frequently a total ass (not usually to me - though that I am not above reproach is also very cool.) So, clearly I think they're completely great.] But I am unsure if this is a good decision on my part or if I am making something out of nothing. Like, is this person just keeping me “on the hook“? Or is there something more to it? In discussing this with both T, now Dr. T to us regular folk, and R, the answers were the same, “Well, why would a guy buy a cow when he gets the milk for free…?” I am not really interested in being bovine. Or purchased for that matter. But their point is clear. The only way to find out the answer the questions I have would be to withhold the milk. [Have I mentioned I am lactose intolerant?]
I would almost just rather pass the person a note via a third-party and be like, “Do you like me? ____ Yes ____ No”
I am annoyed that there have to be rules to stuff like this. But it appears, from all angles that there are. I tried to justify the decisions I had made: I know the person fairly well. There have been “signs” that suggest certain things. The nervousness. Who called who. Who did what, when, where.
Whatever.
The reality is that people are messy and honesty is like using a bad paper towel to clean up a big old pile of reality. It makes it worse first. Telling someone how you feel is risky and difficult. And judging from my personal tastes, it is also a pretty direct route to awkward. I tend to not talk about these kinds of things. To anyone really. Let alone the specific people to whom I should be speaking. [My grandma apparently said about me as a young child, "A will share about anything that doesn't matter." Or something along those lines.]
The further reality is that I have never been made to feel so nervous around someone before, and this nervousness makes me feel like a total jackass and likely act like one too. Thus perpetuating the cycle wherein the rules become tedious and the realities become obfuscated.
Moooooooooo.
October 5, 2011 | Categories: Absurd Shit, California, Friends, Life, Perception, San Francisco, Things I Wish I Would Have Thought Of, true stories | Tags: boys, cows, crushes, Friends, On the hook, Relationships, rules, smart people | 4 Comments »
Sitcom Wisdom.
I don’t watch much TV. I have it on more than normal lately, but I am still not watching much of it; even in a totally compromised mental state I find most of it really tedious, I’d rather just look out the window.
In the midst of my spaced out staring the other day I flipped past a sitcom called “How I Met Your Mother.” I have never watched this program, but I saw Doogie Howser on it and so I stopped for a minute. These people were talking about being “on the hook” and how everyone has been both the hook-ee, and hooker. For lack of better terms. The episode is summarized thusly:
When a beautiful young woman “hooks” Ted (keeping Ted in reserve as backup while she pursues her own dream boyfriend), the gang discusses their own experiences both as the one who “hooks” and the one on the hook.
Huh.
On the hook. It got me thinking. Am I on the hook? Am I keeping anyone on the hook? And since being “off the hook” is cool, what does it all even mean?
It is certainly on my mind whether or not it’s on the hook. Or, in general, off the hook.
October 5, 2011 | Categories: Absurd Shit, Life, Perception, Relationships, Things I Wish I Would Have Thought Of | Tags: boys, Doogie Howser, girls, How I met your mother, Relationships, sitcoms | 1 Comment »
Pay it forward.
Storage units are funny things. I mean, not really funny like haha. Funny like they are metaphors for a lot of shit. I actually hate storage units. I mean, the idea that we have too much stuff to keep it with us, in our daily rotation is really pretty absurd. George Carlin sort of nailed it way back when.
But aside from the obvious point that storage units clearly demonstrate that we have far too much stuff and are wasteful and greedy and driven by consumption, they are also our ball and chain, our scarlet letter, our mark of Cain, our niggling memory, our constant reminder of what we were, what we wanted to be, what we could have been, what we started, what we didn’t understand, what we wanted to forget… but in spite of it all, what we could not let go.
Add to all of this philosophical speculation that since I was old enough to acknowledge stuff, I have been almost obsessive about keeping track of it, organizing it, cleaning it, cataloging it, and managing it, and you may get a small glimpse into the insanity that having stuff all over the greater Western US was engendering within me. So, in spite of a ridiculous schedule and an ominous to-do list, I decide to fly up to Reno on Monday to empty out my storage unit.
I was totally ready.
Or, so I thought.
August 26, 2011 | Categories: Friends, Life, Philosophical Underpinnings, true stories | Tags: George Carlin, help, letting go, parents, Pay It Forward, Relationships, Reno, storage, street art, stroage units, Students, stuff, teachers | 2 Comments »
She’s up there… I sees her up there.
August 13, 2011 | Categories: Family, Life, Silliness, true stories | Tags: cats, iPhone photo essay, Matilda, Max, pets, Relationships | Leave A Comment »
A compromising position.
I was talking to T on the phone this morning as she drove to work. A major benefit of having summers off is increased phonability. Like, for instance, yesterday as I was finishing up the last-minute of “really fun” stairclimbing at the Gym (more on this soon, you can be fucking sure) my phone buzzed with a +44 number. I will never not pick up a +44 because it is going to be either Fun Bobby, RG, J, or the goddamned Queen of England. Obviously I answered. It was not the Queen. But, thanks to modern technology and my inability to be shamed into cell phone silence after five years in Hong Kong, J came along as I finished my workout, got changed, went to Safeway and entertained the checkout lady, walked to the nail place and helped me pick a color. So, this morning as I was finishing up my coffee and contemplating the mysteries of catttitude, I was pleased to see T calling in. I figured she could hang with me while cleaned the cat box, did the dishes, watered the plants and headed to yoga.
I was not disappointed. Among other subjects, in what is always worthy conversation, we began to consider the things that are fundamentally necessary for us in a relationship. More to the point we were looking at deal breakers. Or, maybe those are the same things. It’s hard to tell.
One thing we agreed on was that as we get older, (and I don’t actually mean this as a disparaging comment about aging, but rather a statement about how people change over time and perhaps, if they are lucky they get to know themselves a little better too) we seem to have developed more stringent, umm… let’s call them “standards.” It may be true that some people develop their “standards” with more expedience than T and I have, and I am not going to speak to advantages or disadvantages of efficiency in standards-establishment. However, throughout this conversation it seemed to me that the habit of compromising I had cultivated has done little to help me accurately evaluate any of my relationships.
It got us to the fundamental point of confusion. When does having a standard = being stuck-in-your-ways (rigid, frigid, cold, etc.)? Or, again from the more familiar opposite point of view, when does compromising in a relationship = compromising… yourself? I immediately took to the comfort of list making. What have I determined that I simply will not compromise?
July 20, 2011 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Friends, Life, Lists, Relationships, true stories | Tags: aesthetic standards, Benny Lewis, Boyfriends, compromising, double standards, Exes, Fluent in 3 Months, girlfriends, James Gandolfini, Julia Roberts, life lessons, Lists, Poor relationship choices, Relationships, rigidity, standards, The Mexican | Leave A Comment »
Free to be [fill in the blank].
I have not had a repressive, oppressive or otherwise [externally] limited life. I have been blessed with all of the promises that our Founders put forth in the Declaration of Independence in spades. This has been largely due to three factors: my family, the era (1970s NorCal) into which I was born, and courage [derived primarily from a combination of stubbornness, curiosity and (at least initially) naiveté.]
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When I consider independence I always end up thinking about freedom. Really, freedom is what I have relished as a person who has never had to actually fight for her independence. While I appreciate autonomy – on both a personal and statutory scale – it is freedom ”the exemption from external control, interference, regulation and the power to determine action without restraint…” that I love.
And I always have.
July 4, 2011 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Holidays, Life, Philosophical Underpinnings, The Future, true stories | Tags: 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover, autonomy, Declaration of Independence, Fourth of July, Free to be You and Me, freedom, Holidays, independence, Marlo Thomas, Paul Simon, Relationships, Risky Business, The Muppets, what the fuck | 4 Comments »
Round and Around we Rebound: I’m piloting the relationship Swiffer
Throughout my basketball career, my most dominant stats were always rebounding. I had some games where I totally controlled the boards on both sides of the floor. My record for rebounding stood for ten years or so after I graduated. My coach accused me, on more than one occasion, of padding my offensive rebound stats by being such a crap offensive threat on the put back. I can’t tell you if it was intentional but I can certainly tell you I knew how to rebound. This is one of the reasons I always liked Charles Barkley. Anyone who knows anything about basketball knows, the man dominated the boards when he was so inclined. In addition to his general hilarity, bordering on total ridiculousness, and real likelihood to say absolutely anything ["These are my new shoes. They're good shoes. They won't make you rich like me, they won't make you rebound like me, they definitely won't make you handsome like me. They'll only make you have shoes like me. That's it."] Charles always sent the ball home.
I don’t care what people think. people are stupid.
~ Charles Barkley, “The Round Mound of Rebound”
Not that I want to be the Round Mound of anything, but it turns out that rebounding continues to be a particular area of my expertise.
Who knew?
July 2, 2011 | Categories: Absurd Shit, Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Humor, Relationships, San Francisco, Silliness, true stories | Tags: Charles Barkley, dating, matchmaking, rebound relationships, Relationships, Swiffer wet mop | 4 Comments »
#5 is alive and, well… yeah, alive.
I received an email from #5 yesterday. It was rather out of the blue. I had emailed him in October on the passing of my milestone birthday as we share a sun sign, among many other things (not sicknesses or a fondness for China White, however) so it was a reply to my email – technically – though you would not know as it referenced not one thing in the email I sent. It was like a preprogrammed response. It brought on a sense of dejavu that was erie. Where had I seen this before… oh… yeah….
I was glad to get it because it is nice to know that he is still among the living. When I told C$ about this she raised her eyebrow and I had to reflect on what it says about my relationship choices that the fact that an ex remains alive is considered significant. Yes, well, we all know, my choices are notoriously contentious. At best.
Still, the email caught me off-guard and the subsequent emotional responses I had were very strange. It was certainly distracting, but it was also kind of amazing to see the words he chose in a temporally and spatially detached context. I read it several times. In so doing, I recalled the emails he used to send to his ex-girlfriend when we were together and the interpretations of his then-reality that he would describe to her. I always thought that he was trying to ease her mind of any potential worry she might have for him. How often did I feel like telling him, that after the way they ended their relationship he could rest assured that she was not worried – she was relieved to be free. And to what end did he think the bullshit he proffered up would come? Why tell her he was drug free (as if) or that he had finally gotten his shit together (ibid) and was a changed man (ibid). I remembered feeling mildly superior to her in that I knew the reality and she was getting shit. [In hindsight, I think it is clear who was really getting the shit. Or at least the current load of it.] I recalled how she had a sense of propriety over him, like that he would always love her, as the saying goes, as he told her about me. Why would he do this? In this confessional tone? I remembered watching it all.
And I remembered ignoring all the signs that this kind of behavior was not only cyclical, but cyclical(ly – for Jeanne) bullshit.
February 3, 2011 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Life, Perception, Relationships | Tags: addictive personalities, addicts, Chinese New Year, Email, Exes, heroin, Relationships | 2 Comments »
True Stor- CENSORED!!
So, maybe there is some benefit to being anonymous in that you can really write whatever you want – consequences be damned. The downside of anonymity is that you don’t get the legit acknowledgment that you are probably after in the first place (and it seems to me that anonymous attention seekers really have no boundaries in terms of the desperate levels to which they go to for attention, so the theory that all of this is a plea for attention seems substantiated.)
The thing is I love to tell stories, about me about adventures, about whatever. I enjoy this simply for the opportunity to be a rocking raconteur. The other thing is, even if you harbor a rom-com inspired fantasy that you may write something and somehow the one person on the planet who is supposed to read it does, and then somehow you live happily ever after because s/he understood/had an epiphany/realized they had been right (or wrong)/saw the light/determined they could not live without you (or would finally live without you)/offered you a movie-book-tv deal… the reality is that the people who “read” you generally have a personal reason to do so; they found you through a friend or friend of a friend, they are your family or your actual friends, they have a common interest that brought them to you (sorry hot stuff, it was your kitty not your pussy that brought them around…) [Note: I am excluding stalkers here, because those people are not reading your shit anyhow, they are tracking you, which is really different; like I have this ugly group from Akron, OH and San Antonio, TX who are constantly tracking me, as well as a very strange individual from KNX, TN, but it is not because they want to read my blog it is because they are freakishly jealous of my life creeps.]
The way I have conducted my on-line life is as simple as my real life is, which of course is not simple. It is, however, authentic and not some fantastical version of what I might wish my life was. I have chosen to write about real shit that happens to me (sometimes pretty fucking embarrassing shit), real shit that happens to people I know (sometimes pretty unbelievable shit) and real people (sometimes seemingly unreal)… because I am real.
This has led to some interesting consequences and outcomes.
December 22, 2010 | Categories: Family, Friends, Life, true stories, Writing | Tags: anonymity, authenticity, blog stats, blog topics, Blogging, blogs, liars, reality, Relationships, true stories, Twitter, vicarious living | 9 Comments »
The Retribution Hook Up.
I have been wanting to write about this but then thinking, hmmm…. perhaps it is too much for certain members of my audience. But I am struggling with the notion of censure these days as well as the more basic censor. I am torn. The question of how personal to be – or not to be – begs a degree of serious consideration. But then, at this point, it seems like, what the hell. Scandal sells, and my circus of a dating life could be a NY Times syndication.
So, as Mr. Vonnegut so aptly said, it goes.
When one gets asked out it is hard to not be flattered and I would say this even includes the requests that come from people you would never even consider offering an affirmative. It is nice. It is validating. It makes you feel special, like, selected or something, even if you were already feeling pretty fly about yourself. When I was recently asked out by OMYSFYSFYBMM I was all of the above, though I was certainly not averse to acquiesecing. I was pretty psyched, frankly. And, as the details of the date are not really so salient here, plus I think people have imaginations that might lend more color to the story than my words might, I will just say it was a pleasant set of circumstances all the way around. It was what I would describe as a successful date.
For all of these reasons, you can imagine my surprise to learn, on the second date, that OMYSFYSFYBMM has – not had, but has – a girlfriend.
-Uh…
-Yeah, well, I know. It is kind of weird.
-Umm, weird is not precisely how I would describe this.
-Well, we have been having some problems for the last few months and…
-”Few months”?
-Well, we’ve been together for five years…
-Five years?
-It’s just that, well, I don’t know. She was cheating on me and so we have been sleeping in separate bedrooms…
-You live together?
-Yeah, we bought a house last year. And the thing is, it is kind of complicated…
-You think?
-I just.. well, I don’t know how things are going to go and well, there is a kid…
-You have a kid?
-No. I mean, well she has a kid. And, well, he is 12 and I have been you know, with him since he was like seven and…
-I think the word you are looking for is not the linking verb ‘with’ but rather the active verb ‘raising’.
-Yeah, yeah. That is the thing. And so… Well, really I had sort of made up my mind to try to work it out with her the day that I asked you out and…
-Why did you ask me out?
-The first time I saw you I knew I wanted to get to know you, you were just totally intriguing and -
-’Get to know me’?
-Well, yeah, and -
-But, you are in a relationship.
-Yeah, well, like I said I am not sure-
-You live together with a child.
-I know, it is confusing. But she was seeing some other guy and I, well, I didn’t think you would be so cool and-
-You ‘didn’t think I’d be so cool’?
-I don’t know, I had no idea I would be so interested and -
At this point a million things were going through my mind. On the one hand I felt lucky that he had not confessed that he had AIDS or scabies (under our current circumstances, the latter would be more problematic than the former). On the other hand I was super irritated at the notion that he even thought I might not be ‘so cool.’ Then again, I was glad to know he was not fathering children around the City with reckless abandon and that he seemed to accept responsibility for the one he was “with.” And it was nice to know that someone thought you were hot enough to ask out on the day you had decided to attempt to work it out with your LTR. What the hell?
And then it hit me: “The Retribution Hook Up.”
It made perfect sense. He had been pissed off enough to try to ‘do unto others’ as it were. She cheated. He would cheat. This was new for me. “The Other Woman.” I thought about this label. I did not like it. Making completely fucked relationship choices for my own life has been a full-time occupation, I hardly have the time to be fucking up other people’s shit.
I considered the karma I have undoubtedly piled up with my past relationships and the attendant fall-out. It is substantial to be sure. Could this be a part of it? Maybe. It could also just be my own proclivity towards selecting, from an admittedly wide array, the most likely person to cause me problems in an intimate, interpersonal way. The whole situation stinks. And of course, OMYSFYSFYBMM and I are incredibly compatible in a million ways. I suppose the cheating may be one of those. When he texts or calls, which is always just when I have gotten him off my mind, it takes an iron will to simply ignore. I called in all the girls as my support network. C in HK reminded me in her perfectly succinct way:
Stop feeding that stray cat of a man.
This is a dead-end street with a car coming.
No.
That woman will go apeshit. Do not continue. She will be angry and blame woman not man.
So, now I have the opportunity to do the right thing. Maybe it will reduce a bit of my karmic debt and maybe it won’t. But one thing is for sure right about now:
Ho’s before Bro’s – and if you hooked up with me and *then* you were surprised at how cool I am, you are clearly not paying attention.
December 13, 2010 | Categories: Absurd Shit, Friends, Life, Philosophical Underpinnings, Relationships, San Francisco, true stories | Tags: Boyfriends, dating, Friends, friendship, girlfriends, Poor relationship choices, Relationships, validation | 14 Comments »
It is what it is.
Gonna’ get back to basics
Guess I’ll start it up again
I’m fallin’ from the ceiling
You’re fallin’ from the sky now and then
Maybe you were shot down in pieces
Maybe I slipped in between
In general, I am a happy person. This is not to say I’ve not had my dark days. There have been some – many even. Still, my pragmatic optimism has always prevailed and a happy kid I remain. One of the most evident benefits I have enjoyed with age has been the realization that contrary to adolescent belief and conventional wisdom at large, happiness is a choice, it is not a fortuitous occurence that is bestowed upon some and not others.
It simply is what it is.
I was enjoying the company of someone last night who was explaining a set of circumstances that he was not especially happy about, or comfortable about. “I don’t know. It is what it is. You know?”
Yes.
I know.
I considered the habits of my mind as I watched this boy from across the table. I thought of all the time and energy wasted contemplating, manipulating, hoping, expecting, demanding that things be other than what they are. It seems really silly when you think about it like that. I remembered one of my favorite lines ever from my very wise faux-husband, R who said, “I can’t date. I end up sitting at dinner with some chick who is sizing me up for marriage and I haven’t even decided if I want to fuck her yet.” I thought about the moments lost in the present for the ludicrous pursuit of the future. I smiled as I listened to this boy try to convince himself that It might actually be something else than what It is; and then return awkwardly to the acute reality that It still was what It is. I thought about all the times that, after meeting someone and becoming plainly (painfully!) aware of the calvary of Red Flags, I chose to close my eyes and go forward because, It might not actually be what It is. But, always, It is what It is. You know?
Yes.
We know.
I said that this was good news; it being what it is, and of course, knowing that it is what it is. He said no. It would be better if it was not exactly what it is. But then, I said it would not be what it is at all. He agreed. Perhaps this is better. This. Being what it is, and all. I thought about the freedom in not worrying about what it might be, or could be, or should be, or would be. How much more of the now does one want to give to consideration of the later? Now seems nice to me. None of this is easy when you are mired in complexities of the now, but it is possible. He told me he was concerned about, you know, it turning out to not be what it seemed to be. Then, it will be what it becomes, I said. He looked at me and nodded. “I guess,” he said. “I just needed to let you know, you know. What it is.”
Yes.
I know.
In the pursuit of happiness much silliness has occurred. Always leaving the now for the then and conveniently placing the eventual happiness out there in the when. If I make more money. If I lose weight. If I get a better job. If I get a better guy/girl/house/suit/nose/title/life… But last night while we sat and enjoyed pizza and beer and music and San Francisco I told him that what it is, is just right. And he looked at me, and replied:
Yes.
I know.
December 3, 2010 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Friends, Life, Perception, Philosophical Underpinnings, Relationships, true stories | Tags: Counting Crows, dating, happiness, Relationships, the pursuit of happiness | 3 Comments »
Now serving a conlfict of interest: Would you like a glass of #wine with that?
A boy meets a girl on the interwebs. This is not a dating site and so the conversation is not bent towards engendering any sort of intentional relationship, but the boy and the girl enjoy witty banter and savvy political commentary and so they continue to “talk.” Of course they have no idea what their individual voices sound like because they don’t really talk. They Tweet. Or Chat. Or Whatever. The contact becomes regular enough that they each believe they know the other. They are Friends. I wonder what each one imagines the other’s voice sounds like. Do they contemplate the way the other would use their hands to punctuate a particularly salient point, or what they smell like? Out there suspended on the interwebs all of that IRL detail is completely malleable, manifested entirely on the screen of the beholder.
One day the boy is no longer there. In truth the girl doesn’t notice right away because she has been drawn away from this particular interface of the [tangled] Web We Weave. In real life would you notice if one of your daily conversants was suddenly absent? Gone? Dissipated without a trace? I am not sure anymore, but I think, in spite of our increasingly complex cocoons of self-involvement, perhaps.
The girl sends out an electronic search party for her Friend. Email. Tweets. Wall posts. The search party is effective and within an hour the missing person has been found. Where were you? What happened? It was bad. I freaked out. I had to… to… delete my account. Oh. Wow. Why? It got too intense. Oh.
The boy had met another girl. In similar fashion he had begun to connect with his new Friend. Or was it a Follower? It is so hard to tell sometimes. Maybe he was the one who Followed.
Followed where?
Into the rabbit hole. [Lewis Carroll, you had no idea.] One interface makes you bigger. One makes you smaller. That is still true. They were bigger. So big in each other’s eyes. After one month they were in Love. Love is good. I understand how certain conditions lend themselves to the formation of incredibly intense relationships; I have always found that the bonds that are formed among travelers are like this. Intense. Quick. Flashpoints. The union of shared experience.
Shared experience?
As the boy tells his Friend of his Love she is curious but unafraid. This boy has a need she could never fill and she cares for him as a Friend. A Follower. She listens to his lament. It is a tawdry tale to be sure. Full of duplicitous, passive aggressive behavior so easily perpetrated from behind the one-way mirror of the computer screen. He looks for meaning in everything. Everything is a code to be broken. Nothing is as it seems. This is confusing. I am as I seem. Yes, but you are different. Aren’t you as you seem? Yes, but I am different. Why are we different? I don’t know.
It is as if the progress of the relationship has been on hyper-speed. How can you get to the icky parts without the honeymoon parts?
What do you like about her? What does she like about you? Do you know what each other smell like? How you sort your mail? Which way you like the toilet paper on the roll? You have not met.
But you are in love.
Yes.
Oh.
Well, she says to the boy, do we get to be friends again? I have missed you. Yes, yes of course.
Then the whole strange cycle starts again. They are friends. They communicate. There is some expectation of coded meaning, that nothing is as it seems. That people are not being honest. What can we deduce? What can we find out? What do you want to know? Will you feel better to know things you do not want to know? Yes. Yes. Yes. Of course, YES.
Now the boy’s Love is not okay. She cannot allow him to be friends with any other girls out there among the fiber-optic milieu. Why? She says it is because all the other girls are whores who are using him to suit their own agendas. That he is naïve and cannot see that they all want something from him. That they are taking advantage of him.
What she means to say is this:
You cannot be friends with any other girls because if you fell in love with me by communicating this way you can just as easily fall in love with them the same way. It was so easy. So immediate. And it is real. So real. And so all others are a threat because who’s to say that the same thing won’t happen again and be just as real. I must hold on. Or else I will lose. You.
That is what she means to say. But she cannot say that.
The boy, too, has issues. After all this is serious business; he updated his Facebook status to reflect that he was “In A Relationship.” Because he is so desperate for the words his Love Tweets and Chats and Posts to be real, he is compelled to place equal weight on all her typed sentiments – whether they are backed by gravitas or levity. It is a conundrum.
And so they “fight” through Tweets and Chats and Posts. As if relationship communication were not already complicated enough.
The boy is conflicted. The Love is mad. The girl is watching. The boy is now no longer allowed to be friends with the girl by mandate of the Love. The girl finds this frustrating, though not world ending. She wonders why they cannot be friends and continue their witty repartee. But the Love said no and the boy had to prove his love to his Love. The girl goes on, she has friends in town from overseas, friends to meet for dinner and an internet friend to meet in the flesh. She is sad about the boy. Or maybe for the boy. But in the end she just logs off.
I mean really, they never even met.
[image from here.]
November 8, 2010 | Categories: Life, Perception, Relationships, true stories | Tags: competition, Facebook, friendship, girlfriends, internet, IRL, Relationships, trust, Twitter | 11 Comments »
Jeux sans frontieres
It is hard, you know, being ‘in’ the game and not ‘playing’ games. That balance makes understanding the rules of the game that much more confusing, and as a life long proponent of honesty (not always carried out, but always condoned – don’t ask, it is one of the intricacies of the ‘rules’) it is very confusing to consider that honesty may not actually be the best policy. It turns out that honesty is so subjective, the concept is paradoxical. One’s honesty is only as true as the lens through which it is viewed. [It is that T.O.K. question all over again: Do we see things as they are, or as WE are? I believe that answer is becoming much more obvious.]
I feel clearer about things – life – than I have in years. Maybe ever. It is really refreshing. Better than that, it is totally relaxing. I never understood the amount of work that would have to go into arriving at a place where it is completely possible to not ‘sweat the small stuff.’ Perhaps this too, is a paradox of life, but either way, here I am. Parking ticket? Yeah, it is a pain, but whatever. Didn’t get every little thing done for work when I said I would? Not ideal, but oddly, no one seems to care and it dawns on me that through all those years of killing myself to be perfect (ha! – you laugh, and I see that now) I was the only one who really gave a shit. Everyone else is just caught up in trying to manifest their own version of perfection; amazingly they are not so concerned with my shit. Didn’t please everyone, every minute of every day? GTFO. Now that I have stopped attempting to embody the impossible I can really embrace the perfection of imperfection.
As a result, a sort of relaxation takes over, leading not to passivity or disconnection, but (again with the paradox – irony?) actually a sort of productivity and authentic appreciation of reality that was previously impossible.
Thus I laugh to read the email that makes a Langston Hughes-ian reference to me as a [dream?] deferred. Really? Deferrals? We shall see, professor. Further, I look with curiosity on the one who says, “no relationship, please,” unaware of the Jungian reality that “the meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed,” and therefore a relationship exists. How touching, in a sort of sad way, to think that genuine friendship – interest – a sort of kindness, could be interpreted as neediness, desperation… even worse, as “The One Who Came Before.”
I am pretty sure that these things would have caused me a measurable amount of distress not so long ago, manifesting in a compulsion to explain myself in ways that only served as evidence of that which I aimed to refute. Now? No need. You have a protocol you gotta follow? Okay. Send the email you were too – too what? – to send before, saved now by thousands of miles. Do the dinner date that makes you feel better as a follow-up for the “other thing” we did. Lay down the law about when to call or not to call. Whatever. It’s not about me, really, is it?
It’s your bag, baby. When you work it out, I may be around to look inside. Then again, I may not, and either way, Imma be just fine.
And some day, you’ll see; it coulda been that easy all along.
Hans plays with Lotte, Lotte plays with Jane
Jane plays with Willi, Willi is happy again
Suki plays with Leo, Sacha plays with Britt
Adolf builds a bonfire, Enrico plays with it…
September 8, 2010 | Categories: Friends, Life, Perception, Relationships, Things I Wish I Would Have Thought Of, true stories | Tags: Friends, friendship, games, Jeux sans frontieres, Life, Peter Gabriel, Relationships, TOK | 4 Comments »
You gotta have a J-O-B if you wanna be with me [The Repatriate Papers, Vol.4]
“Help yourself to my advice. I’m sure not using it.”
The job market totally sucks now. This is not a news flash, I am aware, but still: Dayum. The odd thing right now is that I am fighting the most with my own consciousness, like more than I am fighting that actual reality of being unemployed. Everyone’s got a lot of advice for me. It varies between total astonishment at my decision to come back to the States to all manner of ways to make a buck to suggestions that I get out. I am taking it all on board, with caution.
The facts are this: 1) The job market sucks, especially since I am a teacher and the State of California has sort of decided it cannot afford education or something. 2) I need to have a job because it turns out I really enjoy a “certain” lifestyle. 3) I should be a top contender for most of the jobs I am applying for, but the door of entry is logistically and bureaucratically jammed in many situations. 4) I am sort of enjoying hanging out Odd Todd-style, which is not conducive to the task at hand. 5) Everyone-minus-2 keep telling me they “know” I am going to get a job. 6) The 2 are pretty concerned, but finally admitted that they sort of hoped I wouldn’t get a job so I could go to the Playa. 7) I am calling out all of the stops for relying on connections and references – digging deep – and seeing where that is going to take me. Hopefully not an early grave. 8) For now, I am going to go have a picnic lunch at Dolores Park and worry with this later. Just as soon as I call upon an old acquaintance that I knew in a very specific way via Ex #2. It is either going to be awesome or catastrophic.
So you can see that the job hunt marches on. With a few deviations from the path.
Then there is the impending March of the Birthdays, which keeps on coming like a Roman phalanx. This weekend we celebrate MPFW, Kristi and J, not long after D and K and the T and Dee. And no matter what people say, this one is significant. Where did we all think we would be by this time? I can’t speak for everyone, but I know I had no idea that I would be where/who/how I am. It has been fun watching my girls all shake off the preconceptions that come with 2010 for those of us who started out in 1970. Everyone’s got advice for us. Suggestions for solutions and remedies and strategies. I don’t mind. I actually like it.
Some of us are just different I suppose. But that still doesn’t change the fact that I need to get a job.
Tomorrow.
July 15, 2010 | Categories: Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Family, Friends, Life, Relationships, true stories | Tags: Catherine Tufariello, Eddie Murphy, employment, Friends, Gwen Guthrie, I need a job, job hunting, poetry, Relationships, unemployment, unusual ways to try to get a job | Leave A Comment »
My own comedy of errors. And this shit is true. Seriously.
The only thing that is going to offer any kind of credibility to the following story is the simple fact that I could not really be making shit like this up, because if I could, I would no longer need a day job (and for the record, I DO need a day job, so if anyone has any fabulous ideas, call me.) For dramatic effect (though little is needed) I am going to start in the middle. We’ll see how that goes…
Apparently a funny thing happens to people when they get to be a “certain” age; they start to really re-evaluate their lives and, depending on said analysis, they start taking actions that might be slightly out of character. I am being euphemistic there. Basically, when people get to an age where they start to look at their lives more from the point of how they are ever going to get to do all the things they want to do rather than from the point of view that they have forever to do all the things they want to do, they start doing some whacked out shit. I believe I am at or around that age. Whether I have succumbed to the whacked-out-shit-phase is likely a fairly subjective notion.
One of the things that has fully dominated the psyches of many of the women I know and the men who will admit it within my peer group, is the partnering-up urge. It’s like a latent Sex & the City virus. I have never been married (or divorced – win!) so I will have to speak to some of these things as an observer rather than a practitioner, but I certainly have been on the coupling up bandwagon. Due to some pretty choice moments over the past couple of years, I am much more detached from this phenomenon, but it lingers and occasionally rears its ugly little head into my otherwise pretty satisfying life. One of these head-butts contributed to my creating a profile on an on-line dating site. Yeah, yeah. It was as bad as I could have ever imagined it. But as they say, ‘all my friends were doing it’ – and no, I would not jump off a bridge if ‘all my friends were doing it’ (mom) but, I thought, “Hey, it is the information age, maybe this is how people do it these days… I shouldn’t knock it until I try it.” [Error #1: not trusting my gut instinct that this was a really bad idea, at least for me - people who are unfamiliar with IRL dating should not embark on the virtual variety. Real. Talk.]
After creating a profile and meeting approximately three people, all of whom were really prefect for that scene, and totally repulsive to me, I realized that this was not the way forward no matter how many people told me they ‘met their husband on Match’ or they had a neighbor who found their soul mate in some forum, on such and such website. I was done. I happened to be having this conversation with two of my closest HK friends in October of 2008 as we sat in Carnegie’s enjoying a nice adult beverage. Now, one of these friends is committed to the on-line dating world and she is sticking with it, full throttle and has a clear agenda. The other could not be more of the opposite. I guess I was sort of the one in the middle, on the proverbial fence… but I was getting ready to jump over into friend #2′s yard. We were talking about the ins and outs of all of this: dating, meeting people, marrying people… The pros, cons, pressures, stereotypes, assumptions. All of it. It was sounding worse by the second and I was sure I was making the right decision to leap off the fence. In the midst of the conversation, my iPhone did its little techno bleep letting me know I had new mail. I checked it. It was an email from someone on the soon-to-be-deleted dating website. [Timing adds so much to this story.]
We/I opened the email. I looked at the message which said something along the lines of “I am from San Diego and graduated from UCSD and now live in San Francisco and travel to Asia frequently for business and will be there this weekend and your smile caught my attention and then I saw the UCSD connection and that there was a PoliSci connection and so hey.” In typing this now, the number of red flags seems more apparent than I thought at the time for sure, not the least of which is the implication of bullshit that can be detected from such effusive run-on sentences. I looked at his photo.
I knew this dude.
June 15, 2010 | Categories: Absurd Shit, Chasing the Life I was Supposed to Want, Relationships, true stories | Tags: Chili Palmer, Cousin Eddie, dating, delusional narcissists, dishonesty, disinformation, douchebags, Generation of Swine, Get Shorty, girlfriends, Harlequin Romance, Hong Kong, marriage, Old School, on-line dating, People who need to really find something better to do with their time, Poor relationship choices, Relationships, San Francisco, Sex and the City, The Poor Choices Show Podcast, You've Got Mail | 13 Comments »
Lamma for Life: Thank you my friends… xoxo
For all you guys from Yung Shue Wan to Pak Kok Tsuen… you have made the five years more of everything, in every way.
Big love especially to: Peter Berry, Karine (Frenchie!), Cath & Daz, Andy Griff, Kate Locke, Aussie Kelly, Camellia, Sue, Canadian Tamara, Jill, Chris T., Dave & Eva, Rodney, Adele & Neem, The Book Group, Eric C., Tracey & Jerry & Lucas, Nickie, Olly & Lucinda & Gus, Noah & Trinh & Zoe, Vicky & André, Rhys & Lizzie & Alba…
My fabulous kitties: NORMAN & MATILDA…
And my amazing parents… because everyone should be so lucky to have the lattitude, encouragement, support and love that Carol & Terry have always given me.
♥
June 11, 2010 | Categories: Family, Friends, Home, Hong Kong, Life, Relationships, true stories | Tags: book groups, cats, Family, Friends, friendship, gardens, Home, Hong Kong, Lamma Island, my house, nightlife, Pak Kok Kau Tsuen, parties, pets, Relationships, South China Sea, Yung Shue Wan | 5 Comments »


















